Wednesday 23 September 2009

Business & Human Rights website publishes letter to President Arroyo

PIPLinks … presented a letter to President Arroyo…raising issues around the recent concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) ... [that urge] the Government to acknowledge that racial discrimination exists in the Philippines, to ensure that Indigenous Peoples are protected in situations of armed conflict and that independent and impartial investigations are conducted into all allegations of human rights violations …[ I]t recommended that the Government fully implement the IPRA … [and] made specific recommendations on the activities of TVI Pacific, who are operating in the ancestral domain of the Subanon at Mount Canatuan …



See:- http://www.business-humanrights.org/Links/Repository/165752

Monday 21 September 2009

Text of letter from PIPLinks to President Arroyo re CERD country observations

President Arroyo
c/o the Philippines Embassy
8 Suffolk Street
London, SW1 4HG


18 September 2009

Your Excellency,

I am taking the opportunity of your visiting the United Kingdom, to write on behalf of Indigenous Peoples Links, a UK-based support organisation working to uphold and promote the collective and individual human rights of Indigenous Peoples. We would like to raise issues around the concluding observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), which were made public on 31st August 2009.

The CERD issued its recommendations to the Philippines Government following its review of the Government's overdue report (and in doing so invited the Philippines "to observe the deadlines set for the submission of its reports in the future"). The CERD welcomed various positive developments in the legal framework, such as the 1997 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA). However, it raised a number of concerns and recommendations in relation to respect for Indigenous Peoples' rights in practice.

In relation to the mining operations of TVI in the Ancestral Domain of the Subanon of Mt Canatuan, which has been subject to a submission to CERD's Early Warning Urgent Action Sub-Committee, the Committee noted that it "remains concerned that contradictory information continues to be presented to it with regard to the status of actions taken to address the violations of the Subanon people's rights and destruction of their sacred mountain." To address these violations of the Subanon's rights the Committee urged the Government 'to consult with all concerned parties in order to address the issues over Mt. Canatuan in a manner that respects customary laws and practices of the Subanon people and welcomes information from the State party in relation to further developments'

The Committee made an extensive set of recommendations in relation to its concern regarding the Government's implementation of Indigenous Peoples' rights, including urging the Government to:
· acknowledge that racial discrimination exists in the Philippines;
· gather disaggregated data on the situation of Indigenous Peoples through a consultative process with them;
· ensure that Indigenous Peoples are protected in situations of armed conflict and that independent and impartial investigations are conducted into all allegations of human rights violations;
· adopt adequate measures in order to ensure the enjoyment by internally displaced [Indigenous Peoples] of their rights under article 5 of the Convention, especially their right to security and their economic, social and cultural rights;
· conduct an independent review, in consultation with indigenous peoples, of the legislative framework in relation to indigenous property, with particular regard to the question of consistency between the IPRA, its implementing guidelines, the Regalian doctrine and other related doctrines, as well as the Mining Act of 1995;
· fully implement the IPRA, in particular by securing the effective enjoyment by indigenous peoples of their rights to ancestral domains, lands and natural resources, and ensuring that economic activities, especially mining, carried out on indigenous territories do not adversely affect the protection of the rights recognised to indigenous peoples under the aforementioned Act;
· streamline the process for obtaining land rights certificates and take effective measures to protect communities from retaliations and violations when attempting to exercise their rights;
· verify that the current structures and guidelines/procedures established to conduct FPIC are in accordance with the spirit and letter of the IPRA and set realistic time frames for consultation processes with indigenous peoples.';
· verify that the apparent lack of formal protests is not the result of a lack of effective remedies, the victims' lack of awareness of their rights, fear of reprisals, or a lack of confidence in the NCIP;
· 'to consider ratifying...ILO International Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (No. 169)' and 'making the optional declaration provided for in article 14 of the Convention'.

Finally the Committee required the Government to report back in one year in relation to:-
· actions taken to implement the recommendations of the reports of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions and of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of Indigenous People;
· developments at Mt Canatuan in relation to the respect for customary laws and practices of the Subanon people;
· steps taken to streamline the process for obtaining land rights certificates and to put effective measures in place to protect communities from retaliations and violations when attempting to exercise their rights.

Given the above we would like to enquire what concrete measures your Government will take in order to implement these recommendations, particularly to ensure that the voice of Indigenous Peoples is heard more directly with regard to these important issues. Specifically we would like to know how you intend to "conduct an independent review, in consultation with indigenous peoples, of the legislative framework in relation to indigenous property", that also verifies "current structures and guidelines/procedures established to conduct FPIC are in accordance with the spirit and letter of the IPRA".

We look forward to hearing back from you at your earlier convenience.

Yours faithfully,


Geoff Nettleton
Coordinator
Indigenous Peoples Links

Friday 28 August 2009

Treaty urges govt to protect indigenous peoples

Human Rights commissioner says fighting in Mindanao has caused concern among United Nations experts

Manila Times, By Ira Karen Apanay, http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2009/aug/22/yehey/prov/20090822pro1.html

22 August 2009

A United Nations human rights treaty has urged the Philippines to protect indigenous peoples (IPs) from armed conflict, extrajudicial killings and discrimination, as the body examined the Philippines ' compliance with the international Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD).

Human Rights Commissioner Cecilia Quisumbing said the current fighting in Mindanao and its effect on indigenous peoples and evacuees has attracted the concern of UN experts on racial discrimination.

"This brings another human rights dimension to the renewed combat in the South. Not only the rights to life, liberty, property and security of persons but also, the need to consciously and effectively protect minority groups," Quisum-bing said in a statement.

Quisumbing said members of the Com-mittee also urged the Philippines to enact a general law that prohibits discri-mination based on race and ethnicity.

The CERD, which is made up of experts from 18 countries, reviewed the report submitted by the Philippine government in a two-day session (on August 18 to 19) at the headquarters of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Quisumbing said.

Quisumbing said that among the issues the Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination wanted to discuss were proper respect for Ancestral Domain of IPs and to discuss the lack of a law that prohibits racial discrimination, delivery of basic services to minority groups, statistical measurement to track the rights situation of minorities, and extrajudicial killings of IP activists.

Quisumbing said, the Commission found "no State policy to deny basic services and protections to IPs but under the Convention, the State has the obligation to actively take measures to ensure that certain groups are able to fully enjoy their rights. These areas of promotion and protection of human rights of minorities is where the CHR feels there is a lot of room of improvement."

The committee also wanted to know how the Philippines were addressing the issues of extrajudicial killings, torture and enforced disappearances.

In the CHR presentation, Quisum-bing reported that in the past year of offensives between the Armed Forces of the Philippines and Moro Islamic Liberation Front and Abu Sayyaf rebels, Human Rights regional offices have reported more than 200,000 people in Surigao del Sur and Lanao del Sur took refuge in evacuation centers, many of them from indigenous tribes.

The Commission's regional office in the Cordillera Autonomous Region has recorded 17 cases of IP activists killed and one activist who has disappeared.

The committee experts called the IPRA "innovative" and urged the government to implement it more fully and to measure its effectiveness, particularly with statistics.

The Philippines ratified the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination almost 42 years ago, in September 1967. It is obliged to implement all the provisions of the treaty, and to report to the said committee every two years.

Here is what the Philippine Government had to say on its own performance at CERD ...

RP promotion of indigenous peoples' rights draws UN praise

Manila Bulletin, By Charissa M. Luci, http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/217064/rp-promotion-indigenous-peoples-rights-draws-un-praise

22 August 2009

The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) has praised the Philippines ' law that protects and promotes the rights of indigenous peoples, describing it as "a beacon and revolutionary legislation."

In a report to its home office, the Philippine Mission to the UN in Geneva said the UN committee which monitors compliance of states parties to the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination took notice of the Philippine government's efforts to safeguard human rights.

Ambassador Erlinda F. Basilio, the country's permanent representative to the UN in Geneva and head of delegation, presented to the world body the Philippines' 15th-20th periodic reports (covering the period 1997-2008) at the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland on August 18.

During the presentation, she assured the Philippines ' unwavering compliance to the convention, proof of which are numerous measures put in place to promote and protect the human rights of the indigenous peoples of the Philippines and Muslim Filipinos.
Among these are the implementation of the landmark Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act, the activities of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, creation of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, and the programs of the Office on Muslim Affairs.

"The Philippine government not only acknowledges this rich tradition of unity in diversity, but cultivates it," Basilio said in her opening statement.

She noted that the Philippines has championed the cause of eliminating colonization, repression, and racial discrimination at the international level such as providing asylum to Jewish refugees escaping Nazi repression during World War II and granting refuge to the Vietnamese boat people.

She likewise cited the country's promotion of the interests of developing nations still under the yoke of colonialism at the inception of the United Nations and its being an influential member of the UN Committee against Apartheid, among others.

She also pledged the government's active role in the Durban World Review Conference Against Racism, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, and in pushing for greater protection of the rights of migrants and members of their families in relevant international forums.

Basilio said the Philippines waged war against racial discrimination "through our own national quest for independence, sovereignty, and development, and at the international level."

Tribal leaders join UN hearing vs mining on ancestral lands

http://www.cbcpnews.com/?q=node/10001

8 August 2009

MANILA — The Indigenous People’s (IP) fight to keep their ancestral lands from being desecrated and devastated by mining companies have led three Filipino Tribal leaders right at the doorstep of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland as the world celebrates World IP Day on August 9.

Three IP leaders Timuay Jose Boy Anoy, rightful owner of ancestral land in Mt. Canatuan, Siocon, Zamboanga del Norte; Timuay Noval Lambo, Chief elder of the Subanon Council of Seven Rivers in Zamboanga Peninsula; and Peter Dupayat, President of the Didipio Earth Savers Movement Association (DESAMA), and member of the Ifugao community of Didipio, Nueva Viscaya will participate in a United Nation’s Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) hearing on a complaint filed against the Philippine government by the Subanon community.

The elders charged that their rights to the ancestral domains have been breached by the continuous mining activity, accusing the Philippine government especially the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) for being hostile to their cause.

Timuay Jose Boy Anoy had been personally given a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. But the IP leader was ejected from his land by TVI Pacific, Inc., a Canadian Mining company that has been operating in Mt. Canatuan.

Timuay Anoy claimed that NCIP connived with TVI in forming a phony tribal council that gave approval for the company to mine in their ancestral land.

“There was no genuine free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) given to the mining operations. Our customs, traditions, and beliefs have been disrespected by no less than the government,” the elder declared.

For his part, Timuay Lambo said the government should be held accountable for its bigotry towards indigenous people.

“The government must tell the truth. We have been waiting for so long. The government’s report which states that there is no discrimination is purely a lie. [It is] fabricated by the NCIP, through its incompetent local officials,” he said.

Dupayat, whose community in Didipio, Nueva Viscaya was displaced by OceanaGold, an Australian mining company that has mining stakes in the area, said the government should honestly implement the Indigenous People’s Rights Act (IPRA).

“We strongly demand that the real spirit of IPRA should be implemented and a FPIC be sought”, exclaimed Duyapat.

OceanaGold has been abusing the rights of the indigenous community through militarization, displacements and loss of livelihood. He will raise complaints about their community’s situation, Dupayat said.

Environmental group supports IP leaders

Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), a people’s movement, whose advocacy includes fighting for rights of Filipinos against the persisting injustices related to mining, said it will support the project of the IP leaders to explore and maximize international venues where they can assert their rights to pursue the protection and enrichment of their indigenous cultures.

Noting that World IP Day is celebrated globally on August 9, ATM Coordinator Jaybee Garganera said the participation of the three elders at the hearing will bring to light the struggles against discrimination, injustices and militarization they have to endure to keep their lands.

“There are 12 million indigenous peoples in the Philippines and the three IP leaders who will be going to Geneva will speak up, tell their stories and demand that the government should heed their call for their right to self-determination and the United Nations urge and pressure the Republic of the Philippines to address justly, without discrimination, the issues of land rights, militarization, access to justice and protection of indigenous beliefs and practices,” he said.

UNCERD

The CERD is a body of independent experts which monitors the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) by its State parties, which the Philippines had signed on March 7, 1966 and ratified on September 15, 1967.

Having ratified ICERD the government is obliged to regularly report to the Committee on how it is being implemented. However, it has failed in the required regular reporting, and its current report covers only the period of 1998 to 2008. (Pinky Barrientos, FSP)

Sunday 16 August 2009

Indigenous peoples and human rights

By Anabelle E. Plantilla, Nature for Life, Manila Times
http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2009/aug/15/yehey/opinion/20090815opi5.html

15 August 2009

The Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM) held a send-off lunch for Filipino indigenous peoples (IPs) leaders who left for Geneva, Switzerland last week to participate in the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination hearing on a complaint filed against the Philippine government by the Subanon community. ATM is an advocacy group and a people’s movement that upholds the rights of the present and future Filipinos against the persisting injustices related to mining. The three IP leaders are asserting that their rights to the ancestral domains have been violated, and that the actions of the Philippine government, particularly the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples have been adverse against them.

Timuay Jose Boy Anoy, one of the tribal leaders, is the rightful owner of ancestral land in Mount Canatuan. The Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title was personally given to him by President Gloria Arroyo but he has been ejected from his own land by TVI Resources Development Inc.

Timuay Noval Lambo, chief elder of the Subanon Council of Seven Rivers in the Zamboanga Peninsula and Peter Duyapat, president of the Didipio Earth Savers Movement Association belonging to the Ifugao community from Didipio, Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya, have also been ejected from their own domains.

According to the Subanon tribal leader, Timuay Anoy, the commission on indigenous peoples facilitated the formation of a bogus tribal council in connivance with TVI, a Canadian mining company currently doing operations in their ancestral land. Furthermore, Timuay Anoy said that there was no genuine free and prior informed consent given to the mining operations and that their customs, traditions, and beliefs have been disrespected by no less than the government. According to Timuay Lambo, the government must tell the truth and should be held accountable because their report states that there was no discrimination against IPs.

The name Subanon means “river people,” which is derived from the word “suba” or river. The Subanon, also known in the Anglicized form as “Subanen,” is a tribe indigenous to the Zamboanga Peninsula area, particularly living in the mountainous areas of Zamboanga del Sur and Misamis Occidental. As the name implies, these people originally lived along riverbanks in the lowlands, however due to disturbances and competition from other settlers, these peace-loving tribe now reside in the mountains.

Duyapat, whose community is impacted by an Australian mining company, OceanaGold, said that the company has been abusing the rights of the indigenous community through militarization, displacement and loss of livelihood. He will raise complaints about their community’s situation in Geneva and demand that the real spirit of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act should be implemented and genuine FPIC be sought.

The World Indigenous Peoples Day is observed on August 9 every year. There are 12 million IPs in the Philippines and the three IP leaders who went to Geneva will speak up, tell their stories and demand that the government heed their call for their right to self-determination; and the United Nations to urge and pressure the Republic of the Philippines to address justly, without discrimination, the issues of land rights, militarization, access to justice and protection of indigenous beliefs and practices.

ATM will support the initiative of these IP leaders to explore and maximize international venues where they can assert their rights to pursue the protection and enrichment of their indigenous cultures. The ATM is an alliance of mining-affected communities and their support groups of non-government organizations/public organizations and other civil society organizations convened by environmental conservation organization Haribon, Legal Rights and Natural Resources-Kasama sa Kalikasan/Friends of the Earth Philippines and Philippine Partnership for the Development of Human Resources in Rural Areas.

The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is a body of independent experts, which monitors the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination by its State parties. The Philippine government, having ratified the convention is obliged to regularly report to the committee on how it is being implemented. However, the government has failed in the required regular reporting since 1998.

orgsus@haribon.org.ph

Thursday 13 August 2009

Statement by Gukom to UN on tribal justice systems



Statement to the Second session of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Presentation under Agenda Item 4B -UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples - August 10-14, 2009

Speaker: Timuoy Noval Lambo (Philippines)

Thank you Madam Chair for giving me this rare opportunity to shortly speak about our indigenous justice system.

To start with, Madam Chair, I am Timuoy Noval Lambo, a member of the Subanon Tribe of the Zamboanga del Norte province, Mindanao, Philippines. I am representing the Gukom Sog Pito Kodolungan, a group of Subanon families living in a separate adjoining communities and belonging to one common ancestor. Given that the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act is patterned after the draft UN DRIP, we hope that the lessons learned by the indigenous peoples of the Philippines will contribute to the future implementation and interpretation of the UN DRIP with regard to conflict resolution using customary laws.

As a tribe, Madam chair, we have our own established customary laws to govern our people known to our tribe as "Kompongan Nog Botad", a body of unwritten traditional laws, which governs the following:

1. All forms of criminal offenses ranging from simple to the highest form of criminal offense;

2. Family laws governing marriages;

3. Economic activities governing traditional livelihood;

4. Foreign relations; and

5. Religious activities and exercises by the Subanon religious leaders.

Sad to note, Madam Chair, that the exercise of our indigenous justice system had not given due recognition by our Philippine government.

Let me cite to you Madam Chair, one grave example of how the government, through the National Commission of Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), violated our laws by establishing another council of elders for the purposes of obtaining an illegal free, prior and informed consent with regard to mining activities in our ancestral domains. This act of the NCIP caused division and intrigue among our people. In 2004, the Gulang Gukom found them guilty of such act and imposed penalties against this government agency. However, the NCIP failed to comply with such decision.

Another grave incident of violation of our customary laws was committed by a multinational mining corporation in Zamboanga del Norte, Philippines by destroying the Subanon sacred mountain. In 2007, this was brought to the attention of the Subanon highest judicial system for hearing. The Manager of the mining firm was invited to attend the scheduled hearing but instead of attending the hearing under the Subanon customary laws, the company refused the invitation, instead wrote very insulting comments against the authority of the Gulang Gukom. The incident of that Subanon resolution of the hearing of the case was brought to the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) but no action was taken.

In the Philippines, Madam Chair, we have the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act, which affirms that customary laws must be respected, however, despite the existence of this law, government itself has failed to recognize our jurisdiction.

Under this sad experience Madam Chair, the following recommendation be respectfully submitted:

1. Full recognition of indigenous justice system by the Philippine government;

2. All cases involving indigenous peoples filed in the regular courts of justive be referred to the indigenous courts having proper jurisdiction;

3. All cases involving indigenous peoples tried and found guilty beyond reasonable doubt under customary laws and sentenced for a certain period of imprisonment be accepted or admitted to any established government prison cell; and, finally,

4. That government instrumentalities and officials not only be held accountable under national laws, but also under indigenous laws which they violated.

Madam Chair, thank you very much for this opportunity. We hope that this experience will also help other countries and that these cases be brought to the attention of the UN Human Rights Council. Thank you again Madam Chair and may God the Almighty bless us all.

Statement by LRC to UN on state of Philippine indigenous peoples

SPEAKER : Ana Rhia Muhi, Legal Rights and Natural Resources Center, Friends of the Earth Philippines Agenda: 4BStatement to the Second session of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

Presentation under Agenda Item 4B - UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

August 10-14, 2009

Good day to all. Madam Chair, thank you for this opportunity to share with this august body the Philippine experience with regard to policies on remedies, restitution and compensation through this short statement. I am Ana Rhia Muhi representing the Legal Rights and Natural Resources Center, Friends of the Earth Phils., a non-government organization that has been working with indigenous peoples of the Philippines for more than twenty years now. The Center has also been instrumental for the passage of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997. The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of the Philippines is similar to the UN Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, thus we hope that our lessons learned from the implementation of the IPRA would contribute to the implementation of the UNDRIP, especially since the UN DRIP is not necessarily self-executory and would need enabling domestic laws to implement its policies within states.

Madam Chair, as you know, the Philippines is different from most of the countries in that it has a law which specifically focuses on the rights of indigenous peoples to their ancestral territories and to self-determination. Yet, despite the existence of such a law, just recently, on July 29, 2009, indigenous leaders all over the country delivered their own State of the Indigenous Peoples Address, stating that the indigenous peoples of the Philippines remain to be the poorest of the poor, victims of human rights violations and extrajudicial killings, and suffer land insecurity. With regard to these issues, I would like to particularly focus on access to justice vis-a-vís the issue of land insecurity due to the failure for the Philippine government to provide adequate remedies, redress, compensation and restitution.

In 1909, it has been held by the United States Supreme Court decision in Cariño vs. Insular Government that indigenous peoples privately own their territories and the natural resources found within through their native title. Despite this pronouncement however, the Philippine government continues to adhere to a colonial doctrine which states that the State owns all natural resources within the country, or otherwise called the Regalian doctrine. Thus, laws were passed based on the Regalian doctrine to legitimize encroachment and taking of ancestral lands without due process. Also, lands were classified by virtue of these laws into mineral, forest or agricultural lands effectively denying indigenous peoples their territories with just one stroke of the pen.

The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act ( or the IPRA) which was passed in 1997 recognized and was supposed to correct this historical wrong. However, even after more than a decade since its passage, indigenous peoples in the Philippines have not been afforded adequate remedies for restitution and compensation for past and present wrongs. Hardly any community have been compensated from illegal or wrongful taking of ancestral domain. A number of factors are attributed to this. First, IPRA recognizes so-called "vested rights" on lands which were acquired by virtue of discriminatory land laws. Another provision in the law itself limits the period to ten (10) years for an action for reconveyance or the return of illegal or wrongful taking of ancestral land. Additionally, this remedy highly depends on the political will and the budget of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) to represent the indigenous community before domestic courts.

Second, despite the existence of IPRA, executive privileges and powers have been used and abused to weaken indigenous peoples rights through the issuance of regulations and policies, in effect making the law inutile. The current trend in the Philippines as we speak is one that further weakens the right to self-determination with the issuance of regulations that limit the exercise of free, prior and informed consent, public participation, social acceptability and jurisdiction, while ensuring military protection and increase of economic incentives for investors.

Third, access to justice remains to be difficult for indigenous peoples as the NCIP itself has been adamant for indigenous peoples to follow strict and formal remedial requirements so that the complaints of indigenous peoples may be considered.

Other times, it is the NCIP itself that facilitates the entry of extractive industries within ancestral lands through the manipulation of free, prior, and informed consent processes. It is no surprise therefore that some indigenous groups have called for the resignation of NCIP officials. In fact, recently, a panel of Civil Society Organizations, which we were also a part of, disengaged from a process involving the joint review of the Free, Prior and Informed Consent Guidelines with the NCIP as the CSO panel found NCIP insincere and self-serving.

These are only some factors that lead to the further disenfranchisement of indigenous peoples. Thus, we make the following recommendations:

1. Government agencies or instrumentalities which are established or mandated to protect indigenous peoples and their rights be run by indigenous peoples themselves to ensure that such officials understand the dynamics, laws and cultures of indigenous communities. Corollarily to that, indigenous peoples must be given full participation to choose their own representative to decision-making processes at the international, regional, national and local levels;

2. Government executive privileges and powers should not be used to undermine the efforts, most especially those made by indigenous peoples themselves, for the recognition and protection of indigenous peoples rights;

3. Governments should establish remedies and processes for redress of issues that are culturally-appropriate and not necessarily adhere to formal contemporary legal requirements, otherwise making such remedy or process inutile for indigenous peoples;

4. Governments should afford indigenous peoples adequate time and resources to be able to take the most viable option for redress, restitution, compensation and reconveyance;

5. Governments should establish regulations for the reclassification of lands to properly reflect ownership of indigenous peoples to their ancestral territories, and finally,

6. For states and governments, motu proprio or at its own instance, initiate processes and remedies for redress, restitution, compensation and reconveyance in order to correct historical wrongs.

Thank you Madam Chair.

Statement by Peter Duyapat of DESAMA



Statement to the Second session of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples


Speaker : Peter Duyapat from the Didipio Earthsavers Multipurpose Association (DESAMA)

Thank you Madam Chair for this opportunity to share with the participants of this session our experience in the Philippines and to give our recommendations for the consideration of the UN Human Rights Council through the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

I am Peter Duyapat, belonging to the Ifugao indigenous community living in Didipio, Municipality Kasibu, province of Nueva Vizcaya. I am the leader of our local organization, the Didipio Earthsavers Multipurpose Association. In the early 1960s, because of limited livelihood options and poverty, the then Commission on National Integration (CNI) encouraged my family and other Ifugao families to relocate to Didipio, Municpality of Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya from Hungduan, Ifugao Province so that we can establish our community there. Here, we were able to set up our agricultural farms to feed our families. Together with other settlers, we were able to live satisfactorily and our children were able to go to school.

Madam Chair, the problem came when the Philippine government awarded a Financial or Technical Assistance Agreement to Arimco Mining Corporation, an Australian mining company, in 1994. Our free, prior, and informed consent was not given to them, and yet, despite this, the Philippine government allowed the entry of the international mining corporation even with our adamant opposition. In the following decades, we have suffered numerous human rights violations. This would include demolition of our houses, blocking our ingress and egress from the area, physical abuses against other indigenous members of our community, filing strategic lawsuits against public participation, and many more. The most recent of which, when I, myself, last April 2009, was physically attacked by company guards led by the security head and was brought to the Philippine National Police who did not do anything to protect me. I was only released when people came to demand for my release.

We sought the assistance of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), especially with regard to the absence of FPIC for the mining operations. However, we were told that because we were migrant IPs, we did not have the right to FPIC. Added to this, we were charged with criminal cases by government agencies, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, for illegal occupation of forest lands, despite the fact that it was also the government that encouraged us to settle in our area in the early 1960s. Ironically, Madam Chair, they allow mining operations on forest lands which should be prohibited, but do not respect our rights as migrants and long-term settlers.

Madam Chair, there have been a number of times that the mining company, now OceanGold Philippines, Inc., demolished and/or attempted to demolish our homes for the mining operations. Most of the times, the company was accompanied by members of the Philippine National Police. Currently, allegedly because of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo's order, military forces are now deployed in our area. During the past years, President Arroyo has implemented her policy on foreign investments through the establishment of the Investment Defence Forces, wherein military resources of the country are used for the benefit of the corporations, but on the other hand, undermines our rights to voice out opposition.

In light of this, we would therefore like to make the following recommendations:

  1. That migrant indigenous peoples should be afforded the same rights as with other indigenous peoples, especially on the right to self-determination and the right to Free, Prior and Informed Consent;
  2. That military forces should not be used by governments to assist or protect extractive corporations to the detriment of the indigenous peoples; and,
  3. To encourage state governments to pass legislation on natural resource management which fully recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples like the Alternative Mining Bill of the Philippines.
There is a You-tube link to this presentation (although sound is poor quality)

Statement by IPRM to UN on situation of Philippines Indigenous Peoples

Statement to the Second session of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Presentation under Agenda Item 4

By Manja Bayang, on behalf of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Monitor

It is an honor to speak before this august body.

I represent the Indigenous Peoples Rights Monitor, a network of indigenous peoples organizations and support groups, with the mandate of monitoring, documenting and reporting violations of human rights committed by the State and its agents against indigenous peoples and communities.

Thirteen years after the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) and two years after the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) was adopted, indigenous peoples in the Philippines continue to suffer from human rights violations. The Philippines continue to fail in its obligations under the UNDRIP and continue to violate the provisions of the IPRA, the very law which it passed to supposedly protect the rights of indigenous peoples. Ironically, this law is even manipulated to perpetuate violations of indigenous peoples' rights.

Contrary to Article 30, Article 10 and pertinent provisions of the UNDRIP, massive military operations continue in indigenous peoples communities. The Philippines state actively promote and implement its National Internal Security Plan on Indigenous Peoples which perpetrates military operations in indigenous people's lands and the persecution of indigenous peoples' activists. As a result of this State policy and the unabated military operations, indigenous peoples' communities have been subjected to forced evacuations especially of the Lumads in Mindanao, desecration and destruction of their sacred sites. Indigenous peoples have been subjected to various forms of human rights violations ranging from harassments, torture, rape against women, grave threats resulting to sever trauma among children, enforced disappearance and even assassinations of indigenous activists. Since 2001, IPRM was able to document 133 cases of extrajudicial killings of indigenous activists nationwide and one case of enforced disappearance.

The entry of mining and other extractive projects also result to severe militarization of indigenous communities which result to all forms of human rights violations. On January 6, 2008, intense military operations were conducted by the 73rd Infantry Battalion and the Army Scout Rangers in the remote areas of Talaingod, Davao Del Norte. Aerial bombings, army foot patrols, and combat operations greatly alarmed the Ata-Manobo residents, causing them to flee their homes and seek refuge in the forests. Similar evacuations occurred in other indigenous communities because of military operations, forcing them to become internal refugees. The worse impacts fall on the women and children who suffer most in these situations.

Contrary to Article 32, Article 26 and other pertinent provisions of the UNDRIP, the right of indigenous peoples to their lands and territories and to free prior and informed consent, continue to be violated. Large scale mining activities continue in indigenous peoples territories, dams and other hydro electric projects are undertaken, logging is still conducted on indigenous peoples forests. The lands and resources of indigenous peoples continue to be desecrated.

Moreover, the right of indigenous peoples to FPIC is blatantly violated in the context of development projects being undertaken and which are planned to be undertaken in indigenous peoples' territories. The particular circumstances by which the self-determination rights of Indigenous Peoples are denied in the context of development projects vary from community to community.

In view hereof, I would like to forward the following recommendations, taking a bulk of it from the recommendations made during the International Conference on Extractive Industries and Indigenous Peoples on March 25, 2009 in Manila, Philippines that in order to ensure respect for the rights recognized in the UNDRIP, we recommend that EMRIP will:

1. Conduct a study, with the participation of Indigenous Peoples, on the impact of mining and other extractive industries on them;

2. Conduct a study, with the participation of Indigenous Peoples, on the implementation of the National Internal Security Plan on Indigenous Peoples, the counter-insurgency plans and the use of state forces in the advancement of the interests of transnational mining companies and the impacts on indigenous peoples and communities;

3. Along with the Indigenous Peoples Asia Caucus, it is strongly recommended that the EMRIP conduct a thorough study on the realization or lack of realization of the right to self determination, giving emphasis to the implementation of free prior and informed consent;

4. Elaborate mechanisms and procedures for States to implement the minimum standards set forth in the UNDRIP, including in particular Article 30 on military operations and Article 32 on the right to FPIC and to call on other UN procedures, mechanisms, agencies and bodies and other multi-lateral bodies to do likewise;

5. Demand for the strict implementation of International Humanitarian Laws and the UNDRIP in all military operations;

6. Establish practical procedures which provide indigenous communities with the opportunity to request the relevant UN agencies to assist them in the monitoring and provision of independent information on FPIC processes;

7. Request that the Special Representative to the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other businesses, John Ruggie, to actively engage with impacted indigenous community through workshops addressing indigenous peoples rights and mining or other extractive industries, and together with other UN procedures, bodies and agencies, promote the enactment of legislation in home states of transnational corporations to provide for extraterritorial jurisdiction in relation to their activities;

8. Recommend that the World Bank Group and other International Financial Institutions (IFIs) update its operational directives and safeguard policies pertaining to Indigenous Peoples to include the right to FPIC, as required under the UNDRIP. Specifically to recommend to the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to include the requirement to obtain FPIC in its safeguard policies on Indigenous Peoples environment and resettlement;

9. Recommend that the World Bank Group and other IFI's immediately stop funding, promoting and supporting large scale mining and hydro electric projects on indigenous peoples lands, and to provide a timeline for ending of all such funding;

10. Recommend that the World Health Organization consider conducting a study on the impact of cyanide and heavy metals on the right to health of communities impacted by mining.


Let me end this intervention by quoting the famous adage that says, "Our Land is our life"; take it away from us, and your are taking the lives of our people, our children and the generations after us.

Danum id Tudey ya id Gedangan ay menlamnin et was-in di men lamlamnin ta maid mangmangwani en ate (Like the cool waters that spring from our mountains, let us go forth in peace and good health.)

Statement by PIPLinks on extractive industries and indigenous peoples


Statement to the Second session of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples

Presentation under Agenda Item 4b - UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Adjudication, remedies, repatriation, redress and compensation

Comments on paper A/HRC/EMRIP/2009/5 - Report of OHCHR organized International Workshop on the Natural Resource Companies, Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights

Presented by: Andrew Whitmore, on behalf of PIPLinks and Cathal Doyle of the University of Middlesex, Department of Law

With reference to this agenda item, the extractive industries are a cause of considerable conflict for Indigenous Peoples. The recent shooting and killing of Indigenous Peoples in Peru while protecting their lands from extractive companies is a particularly brutal example.

We therefore thank the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights for submitting to this Experts Mechanism meeting their report on the 'International Workshop on Natural Resource Companies, Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights: Setting a Framework for Consultation, Benefit-Sharing and Dispute Resolution', which took place in Moscow in December 2008, as a follow up to the 2001 Workshop on the same issues.

The Moscow Workshop was an attempt to bring Indigenous Peoples and extractive industry representatives together, and therefore consisted of frank discussions on issues of major concern to Indigenous Peoples. These included the need to recognize them as rights holders (as opposed to just stakeholders), the requirement to obtain their Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in relation to all extractive projects in their territories and the need for models of corporate engagement which are based on the recognition of Indigenous Peoples' land rights, regardless of the national legislative framework.

The Office of the High Commissioner report captures much of what was discussed. However, it remains relatively silent on one of the most salient issues raised during the conference from the perspective of Indigenous Peoples - namely that extractive companies recognize the requirement to obtain FPIC, and that FPIC act as the framework and context for all consultations with Indigenous Peoples, including related negotiations pertaining to benefit sharing and mitigation measures.

We feel that it is particularly important for the report of the Workshop to emphasize the requirement to obtain FPIC given the following:
a) The 2001 workshop (which was the precursor to the Moscow workshop) recommended that 'consultation between indigenous peoples and the private sector should be guided by the principle of free, prior, informed consent of all parties concerned'. Indigenous representatives at that meeting were clear that the special value of the Office of the High Commissioner as a convener of such discussion was to prioritise a human rights framework for discussions;
b) In the intervening period the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People has been adopted in the General Assembly with Article 32 requiring that "States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative institutions in order to obtain their free and informed consent prior to the approval of any project affecting their lands or territories and other resources, particularly in connection with the development, utilization or exploitation of mineral, water or other resources.";
c) This issue of consent was raised by a number of attendees at the Moscow workshop, including the government representatives from Greece and Brazil, who emphasized that FPIC was now the minimum standard to be respected.
e) The Experts Mechanism recommended in its first session that the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action 'should acknowledge that both the right to self determination and the principle of FPIC are now universally recognized through the adoption of the Declaration'.

We tabled a submission to the Moscow meeting entitled 'Free Prior Informed Consent - a universal norm and framework for consultation and benefit sharing in relation to indigenous peoples and the extractive sector', outlining the status of FPIC in international human rights law. We would like to submit that paper to the Expert Mechanism with regard to any future research upon this agenda item.

Given the above we wish to make the following recommendations:-

  1. That any follow up studies conducted by the Office of the High Commissioner or the Experts Mechanism explicitly acknowledge FPIC as the recognized minimum standard that must be respected by all actors in the extractive sector, including the private sector, that wish to engage with Indigenous Peoples.
  2. That any future studies on the topic of the relationship of the extractive sector with Indigenous Peoples initiated by the Experts Mechanism or the Office of the High Commissioner should be informed by the report of the 2009 UN Permanent Forum's International Expert Workshop on Indigenous Peoples Rights, Corporate Accountability and Extractive Industries. A copy of this report and the 'Manila Declaration' are provided as an attachment to this statement to inform the debate, and we are aware that an Indigenous network is being created as a result of this meeting that can be consulted upon this, or related, issues;
  3. While understanding the obvious financial constraints of organizing such workshops, it is regrettable that Indigenous Peoples' representation at the workshop was very limited. Independent, direct participation of Indigenous Peoples with expertise of extractive industry operations and human rights is essential. In the interest of ensuring both the relevance and legitimacy of any follow up activities we urge that the United Nations provide a more adequate and flexible funding framework for funding Indigenous Peoples to attend meetings, including such expert workshops.

Tuesday 11 August 2009

Filipino Tribal Leader Leads Prayer At Opening Rites of the UN Experts Mechanism on Rights of Indigenous Peoples


PIPLinks Press Release on behalf of a consortium of Philippine-based organizations*

11th August 2009 - No embargo

Geneva, Switzerland—Timouy José “Boy” Anoy, a Subanon Tribal Leader, led the prayer in the opening rites of the Second Session of the United Nations Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) in Geneva, 10th August 2009.

The EMRIP was created by the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) to provide the Council with thematic expertise, and provide it with studies and research based advice. The EMRIP consists of five independent, indigenous experts. One of the current experts is a Filipino Igorot, Mr. José Mencio Molintas.

The second session of the EMRIP is meeting August 10-14, 2009 to discuss lessons learned and challenges to achieve the implementation of the right of indigenous peoples to education, as well as the implementation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. There are over 400 indigenous delegates, and their supporters, registered from all over the world, who are participating together with the official representatives of governments.

To give the opening blessing to the meeting is an honour bestowed on leaders from different parts of the world. Timouy Jose Anoy said a Subanon prayer that all participants be blessed with wisdom and clarity in deliberating issues. He also prayed that all indigenous peoples from all over the world, who came a long way to the EMRIP get respect, recognition and redress for violations against their rights. Timouy Jose Anoy sprinkled water on the venue to symbolize clarity of thought and coolness of minds.

Timouy José “Boy” Anoy, together with another Subanon Leader Timouy Noval Lambo and Ifugao representative Peter Duyapat will participate in this five-day session to share their experience and propose ideas in addressing violation of rights to land, and rights to self determination by large scale mining companies and the lack of government support for redress.

The three leaders are also attending the 75th Session of the UN Committee on the Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination (UNCERD) to present a report about the discrimination of Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines to the committee as well as to press for a resolution to a Subanon Submission made at a previous meeting of the Committee.


For details/ inquiry please contact:
Lodel D. Magbanua, +63 917 887 01 09, lodel@piplinks.org
Andrew Whitmore, +44 775 439 5597, comms@piplinks.org

* PIPLinks is a non-profit organization, which aims to uphold and promote the collective and individual human rights of Indigenous Peoples (see http://www.piplinks.org). This press release and succeeding statements is done in behalf of a 15 organisation consortium of Philippine based indigenous peoples organizations and support groups.

Photographs from the Indigenous Caucus meeting - Sunday 9th August 2009
















Members of the UN Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (EMRIP) address the Indigenous Caucus meeting on how the mechanism works.

















Members of the delegation attend an 'Asian caucus' meeting in the open air















Timuay José 'Boy' Anoy, Timuay Noval Lambo and Peter Duyapat outside a statue at the World Council of Churches (the venue for the meeting)

Tribal leaders join UN hearing vs mining on ancestral lands

Filipino Tribal Leaders headed to Geneva Switzerland for the United Nation’s Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) hearing on a complaint filed against the Philippine Government by the Subanon community. Timuay Jose Boy Anoy (right), the rightful owner of ancestral land in Mt. Canatuan, who was personally given a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) by Philippine President Gloria Macapagal and Timuay Noval Lambo (left), Chief Elder of the Subanon Council of Seven Rivers in the Zamboanga Peninsula.

MANILA, August 8, 2009— The Indigenous People’s (IP) fight to keep their ancestral lands from being desecrated and devastated by mining companies have led three Filipino Tribal leaders right at the doorstep of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland as the world celebrates World IP Day on August 9.

Three IP leaders Timuay Jose Boy Anoy, rightful owner of ancestral land in Mt. Canatuan, Siocon, Zamboanga del Norte; Timuay Noval Lambo, Chief elder of the Subanon Council of Seven Rivers in Zamboanga Peninsula; and Peter Dupayat, President of the Didipio Earth Savers Movement Association (DESAMA), and member of the Ifugao community of Didipio, Nueva Viscaya will participate in a United Nation’s Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) hearing on a complaint filed against the Philippine government by the Subanon community.

The elders charged that their rights to the ancestral domains have been breached by the continuous mining activity, accusing the Philippine government especially the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) for being hostile to their cause.

Timuay Jose Boy Anoy had been personally given a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. But the IP leader was ejected from his land by TVI Pacific, Inc., a Canadian Mining company that has been operating in Mt. Canatuan.

Timuay Anoy claimed that NCIP connived with TVI in forming a phony tribal council that gave approval for the company to mine in their ancestral land.

“There was no genuine free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) given to the mining operations. Our customs, traditions, and beliefs have been disrespected by no less than the government,” the elder declared.

For his part, Timuay Lambo said the government should be held accountable for its bigotry towards indigenous people.

“The government must tell the truth. We have been waiting for so long. The government’s report which states that there is no discrimination is purely a lie. [It is] fabricated by the NCIP, through its incompetent local officials,” he said.

Dupayat, whose community in Didipio, Nueva Viscaya was displaced by OceanaGold, an Australian mining company that has mining stakes in the area, said the government should honestly implement the Indigenous People’s Rights Act (IPRA).

“We strongly demand that the real spirit of IPRA should be implemented and a FPIC be sought”, exclaimed Duyapat.

OceanaGold has been abusing the rights of the indigenous community through militarization, displacements and loss of livelihood. He will raise complaints about their community’s situation, Dupayat said.

UNCERD

The CERD is a body of independent experts which monitors the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) by its State parties, which the Philippines had signed on March 7, 1966 and ratified on September 15, 1967.

Having ratified ICERD the government is obliged to regularly report to the Committee on how it is being implemented. However, it has failed in the required regular reporting, and its current report covers only the period of 1998 to 2008. (Pinky Barrientos, FSP) http://www.cbcpnews.com/?q=node/10001

Monday 10 August 2009

RP tribal leaders at UN hearing to oppose mining on ancestral lands

Source:- GMANews.tv -
http://www.gmanews.tv/story/169369/RP-tribal-leaders-at-UN-hearing-to-oppose-mining-on-ancestral-lands

9 August 2009

As the global community marks World Indigenous Peoples (IP) Day on Sunday, tribal leaders from the Philippines sought relief from mining on ancestral lands before the United Nations in Geneva.

Three tribal leaders will take part in the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) hearing on a complaint filed against the Philippine government.

IP leaders Timuay Jose Boy Anoy, owner of ancestral land in Mt. Canatuan village in Siocon town Zamboanga del Norte; Timuay Noval Lambo, Chief elder of the Subanon Council of Seven Rivers in Zamboanga Peninsula; and Peter Dupayat, President of the Didipio Earth Savers Movement Association (DESAMA), and member of the Ifugao community of Didipio in Nueva Vizcaya will participate in the hearing.

An article on the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) Web site said the hearing stemmed from a complaint lodged against the Philippine government by the Subanon community in Mindanao.

The elders charged that mining activities in their areas have violated their rights to ancestral domain.

Also, they accused the Philippine government especially the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) of being hostile to their cause.

"Timuay Jose Boy Anoy had been given a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) personally by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. But he was evicted from his land by TVI Pacific, Inc., a Canadian Mining company that has been operating in Mt. Canatuan," the CBCP said.

He claimed the NCIP connived with TVI in forming a phony tribal council that gave approval for the company to mine in their ancestral land.

"There was no genuine free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) given to the mining operations. Our customs, traditions, and beliefs have been disrespected by no less than the government," he said.

For his part, Timuay Lambo said the government should be held accountable for its bigotry towards indigenous people.

"The government must tell the truth. We have been waiting for so long. The government's report which states that there is no discrimination is purely a lie. [It is] fabricated by the NCIP, through its incompetent local officials," he said.

Dupayat, whose community in Didipio, Nueva Viscaya was displaced by Australian firm OceanaGold, said government should honestly implement the Indigenous People's Rights Act (IPRA).

"We strongly demand that the real spirit of IPRA should be implemented and a FPIC be sought," he said.

He claimed OceanaGold has been abusing the rights of the indigenous community through militarization, displacements and loss of livelihood.

Militant group Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM) said it will support the project of the IP leaders to explore and maximize international venues where they can assert their rights to pursue the protection and enrichment of their indigenous cultures.

Coordinator Jaybee Garganera said the participation of the three elders at the hearing will bring to light the struggles against discrimination, injustices and militarization they have to endure to keep their lands.

"There are 12 million indigenous peoples in the Philippines and the three IP leaders... will speak up, tell their stories and demand that the government should heed their call for their right to self-determination and the United Nations urge and pressure the Republic of the Philippines to address justly, without discrimination, the issues of land rights, militarization, access to justice and protection of indigenous beliefs and practices," he said.- GMANews.TV

Friday 7 August 2009

Filipino tribal leaders bring issue to United Nations

Source:- Mindnano Examiner - http://www.mindanaoexaminer.co/news.php?news_id=20090807085716

7 August 2009

QUEZON CITY, Philippines – Today, the Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), an advocacy group and a people’s movement that upholds the rights of the present and future Filipinos against the persisting injustices related to mining, held a send-off lunch for Filipino indigenous peoples (IPs) leaders who will be leaving for Geneva, Switzerland on Saturday to participate in the United Nation’s Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UNCERD) hearing on a complaint filed against the Philippine Government by the Subanon community.

The Filipino Tribal leaders who will be going to Geneva are Timuay Jose Boy Anoy, the rightful owner of ancestral land in Mt. Canatuan - who was personally given a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) by Philippine President Gloria Arroyo - has been ejected from his own land by TVI together with his fellow Filipino tribal leaders Timuay Noval Lambo, Chief Elder of the Subanon Council of Seven Rivers in the Zamboanga Peninsula and Peter Duyapat, President of the Didipio Earth Savers Movement Association (DESAMA) belonging to the Ifugao community from Didipio, Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya.

The three IP leaders are asserting that their rights to the ancestral domains have been violated, and that the actions of the Philippine government, particularly the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples have been adverse against them.

“The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) facilitated the formation of a bogus tribal council in connivance with TVI. There was no genuine free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) given to the mining operations. Our customs, traditions, and beliefs have been disrespected by no less than the government,” said Timuay Anoy.

“The government must tell the truth. We have been waiting for so long. The government’s report, which states that are no indigenous peoples’ discrimination is purely a lie as fabricated by the NCIP, through its incompetent local officials. They should be held accountable,” said Timuay Lambo.

Duyapat, whose community is impacted by an Australian mining company, OceanaGold, has been abusing the rights of the indigenous community through militarization, displacements and loss of livelihood. He will raise complaints about their community’s situation. “We strongly demand that the real spirit of IPRA should be implemented and genuine FPIC be sought,” Duyapat said.

“The World IP Day is observed on August 9 every year and there are 12 million indigenous peoples in the Philippines and the participation of the three IP leaders who will be going to Geneva will speak up, tell their stories and demand that the government should heed their call for their right to self-determination and the United Nations urge and pressure the Republic of the Philippines to address justly, without discrimination, the issues of land rights, militarization, access to justice and protection of indigenous beliefs and practices.”

“ATM will support the initiative of these IP leaders to explore and maximize international venues where they can assert their rights to pursue the protection and enrichment of their indigenous cultures,” said ATM Coordinator Jaybee Garganera.

The CERD is a body of independent experts which monitors the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) by its State parties. The Philippine government, having ratified ICERD is obliged to regularly report to the Committee on how it is being implemented. However, the Government has failed in the required regular reporting, and its current report covers the period of 1998 to 2008.

The ATM is an alliance of mining-affected communities and their support groups of NGOs/POs and other civil society organizations convened by HARIBON, Legal Rights and Natural Resources -Friends of the Earth Philippines (LRC/FOEI) and PhilDHRRA. (Roslyn Arayata)

Thursday 6 August 2009

Blog intro

This blog has been set up to share information of a visit of a delegation to Geneva, Switzerland, to - among other things - lobby the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UN CERD). The visitors are part of a consortium set up by Philippine Indigenous Peoples and their support groups, who have drafted a shadow report in response to the Philippine Government's report to the CERD. The report will be heard on 18th to 19th August, but there are plans to follow up on other activities. These include an urgent action from the Subanon people over a mine on their land operated by the Canadian mining company TVI, to attend the UN Expert Mechanism on Indigenous Peoples beforehand, and to meet with various UN officials.

We will keep people updated as the meetings happen, and share the events and reflections of those participating.

Arrival date Saturday evening, so more news then...